J. Soltys's Weblog

April 8, 2008

Manipulating – This is What Feminism Looks Like

A new PR campaign to promote feminism reminds me of my children; shove everything under the bed where mom or dad can’t see it, then presto, the room appears clean and tidy.
This same tactic is being used for a promotional video put out by the Feminist Majority. In the video, numerous well-known Hollywood actors, male and female, offer their opinions and perceptions on what it means to be a feminist.
I have to admit the production is well crafted, and will be very influential when viewed by the general public.
In its purest form, the ideology of feminism cannot be argued: Equality for men and women that transcend all aspects of life.
And this is the image and mood the video embraces. But as we all know, the devil is in the details.

This video chooses to present feminism as a historical movement that was essential in achieving many of the gains women enjoy today, and how it is still essential to address the modern day inequities that still persist. It also presents the feminist movement as a historically benevolent movement that is embolden through its use of compassion, pragmatic thinking, selfless activism, and the deep desire to help those who are marginalized in society.

So I thought, if feminist and their movement truly embody these altruist qualities, why the need to promote themselves? As the saying goes, “Actions speak louder than words”. 

This is what troubled me the most about the video. This contradiction concerning the need for feminist to promote themselves in spite of all the humanitarian, legendary, and iconic events it claims it has been responsible for. 

To put it in perspective, did Mother Teresa have to promote herself? Did Gandhi have to promote himself? Did Dr. Martin Luther King have to promote himself? These individuals never engaged in self promoting. Their messages were extremely powerful, but only because their actions ultimately provided the catalyst that fueled and validated their messages. And by action, I mean using the appropriate methods to carry out the message by maintaining a standard of integrity, morality, and ethical behavior.

It should also be noted that each of the people I mentioned was greatly humbled, meaning they understood the power of humility. Thus, in order to change others, it meant they themselves must be willing to acknowledge their own faults, and be willing to change also. Therefore, the act of humility brought creditability to them as individuals, and ultimately, brought credibility to their message and their movement.
The feminist have to promote themselves because they have no humility. They have lost creditability with the general public, and more importantly, with the majority of women. They have used sexism to fight sexism, stereotypes to fight stereotypes, and have avoided accountability for their questionable behavior while forcing others to be held accountable for theirs.
Therefore, it appears to me the vague and opaque message about what feminism really means in the video was intentional, because if any amount of clarity seeped in, the benevolent, altruistic image of feminism would begin to deteriorate rapidly.
 

Let me present my view of the feminist movement with respect to some of the views that are offered in the video:

  • One woman says feminism is not about hating men.

Really?

As a man who grew up during the feminist movement, I have been bombarded with aggressive, sexist, and discriminatory comments about men from feminist icons. Let me provide an example:

Marilyn French:

Not many men have both good fortune and good sense.

Men stumble over pebbles, never over mountains.

Whatever they may be in public life, whatever their relations with men, in their relations with women, all men are rapists and that’s all they are. They rape us with their eyes, their laws, their codes.

Gloria Steinem:

A woman reading Playboy feels a little like a Jew reading a Nazi manual. 

– If women are supposed to be less rational and more emotional at the beginning of our menstrual cycle when the female hormone is at its lowest level, then why isn’t it logical to say that, in those few days, women behave the most like the way men behave all month long?

– Pornography is the instruction. Rape is the practice, battered women are the practice, and battered children are the practice.

Andrea Dworkin:

A commitment to sexual equality with males is a commitment to becoming the rich instead of the poor, the rapist instead of the raped, the murderer instead of the murdered.

Men are distinguished from women by their commitment to do violence rather than to be victimized by it.

Men know everything – all of them – all the time – no matter how stupid or inexperienced or arrogant or ignorant they are.

The hate and contempt for men within the feminist movement is well documented. However, not one powerful feminist will step forward and admit this truth without conditions. Nor will they apologize for letting the movement become embroidered with such gender hatred, or make a serious commitment to vilify one of their own who has preached male sexism, as they have done to many men found guilty of sexist behavior towards women.

  • Another woman says feminism is about treating women not as somebody special, but just as equals.

Then why do feminist spend so much time in Washington, and in the family court systems across the nation, fighting for special privileges for women?
Feminist fight any legislation that would ensure child custody cases automatically assume joint custody unless conditions prove otherwise. They favor legislation that conforms to custody inherently belonging to the mother – yet they claim they want no special privaleges.
They fight any legislation that awards resources to male victims of domestic violence, and have been known to walk out of domestic violence seminars when male victims are discussed, because they find male victims irrelevant. This despite their vocalization for men and women to be treated as equals.
They fight any legislation that would bring serious consequences to women who falsely accuse men of rape, sexual assault, or domestic violence, because according to them, it could cause more consequences for true victims trying to find justice.
So the pain and destruction of men’s lives perpetuated by unconscionable female behavior is ignored by feminist who, by their own actions, show feminists put more value on the well-being of women first, rather than show concern for the safety and justice for both men and women. Five men mistakenly sent to prison is nothing more than collateral damage in their process to ensure one true female victim of violence is not hindered in her pursuit of justice. This is their “equality”.

  • One woman implies feminism is about self confidence. She says that if a woman is self confident, then this confidence will be experienced in the bedroom. She then gives the stereotypical provocative wink and nod. Another woman states that if she wants to wear a really short skirt, then she is no less a feminist for doing so.

If there is one aspect of gender politics that irritates me the most, it is the blatant hypocrisy of how feminist, and females in general, approach female sexuality.
Feminist make it clear that the use of female sexuality to sell or promote products/events is sexist, degrading, and is a symbol of male dominance of women. Yet, here they are using the same tactics to promote feminism. I mean, I have to assume the bedroom reference was put in not just for women, but also to appeal to male viewers. Otherwise, why the provocative wink and nod? 
I’ve written about this situation before, and here is my conclusion: Using female sexuality to sell or promote products/events is OK if the beneficiary is a woman – otherwise it’s sexist.
And a woman can flaunt her sexuality all she wants, but if a man mistakens her flaunting for something more, it’s his fault.
Women play both sides of the fence with their sexuality, vacillating between victim status and empowerment status, depending on which position gives them the most power. And feminists are no different.

  • Michael Moore says we [men] have held all the power for ten thousand years and look what we have done with it, implying men have failed miserably.

Well Michael, if I use you as an example, I think us men have done quite well with it. The industry in which you make your living was created by men, and this male industry has helped you gain incredible financial success. Also, this male environment has also provided you with considerable status that most people will never see. And you achieved your success by creating documentaries that have challenged the actions and behavior of some of the most powerful industries and individuals in the world, and you’re not imprisoned, or exiled for doing so. This is because you live in one of the most emulated democracies in the world, which by the way, was idealized, constructed, and actualized by men. 
You’ve done very well in this f***ed up male dominated system, and I don’t recall hearing that you’re sacrificing all your privileges and gains within it, in an attempt to show commitment to your beliefs.

It is well documented that feminism is not the benevolent, altruistic movement the video tries to portray it as. The actions of feminism, historically and presently, do not corroborate the words and images portrayed in the video. This is why it is forced to launch a PR campaign. A campaign such as this is usually reserved for those that have fallen out of favor with public opinion. And feminism is definitely in that category, with polls showing most women who believe in women’s rights refuse to call themselves feminist – a big red flag for their movement.

But as I have shown, feminism has no one to blame but themselves. It has spent years holding others accountable for their malevolent actions, but refuses to honestly acknowledge or rectify their own. Feminism will never achieve the status or image they desire until they first achieve the arduous trait of humility. This is a form of empowerment shared by all real altruistic individuals and organizations, and it brings validity and credibility to their causes. It embodies the spirit that we come together through our imperfections, not become more divisive because of them.

Sadly, for all its self-aggrandizing about teaching empowerment, this movement cannot, and has never shown an ounce of humility. It refuses to acknowledge that it has made any serious mistakes. I liken the feminist movement, and this new promotional video as a modern day re-creation of the fairy tale “The Emperor’s New Clothes”.
The day I see a video that celebrates the achievements of feminism, along with a sincere look at its faults and consequences – by feminist themselves - is the day I know the feminist movement has matured.

Until then, I guess were subjected to watching videos of feminism as seen through their own rose colored glasses, their own limited clarity, and their own recognition as society’s panacea. In other words, if we really want a true picture of feminism, we need make sure we look under the bed.

Video: This is What Feminism Looks Like
Contact:           
soltys.joe@gmail.com
http://jsoltys.wordpress.com
Photo Courtesy of: stockxchng.com
 

 

Advertisement

7 Comments »

  1. Awwwww. Da poor widdle menz. What about THEM?

    Comment by Nobody in Particular — April 29, 2008 @ 12:04 am | Reply

  2. Oh, please, Mother Theresa certainly promoted herself. She spent half her life on world promotional tours, schilling star-quality piety and ‘humility’ for donations. Her first promotion was in the 60s via a BBC TV documentary named ‘Something Beautiful For God’ made by a British intellectual named Malcolm Muggeridge. Prior to this the woman was completely unknown outside of Calcutta and without that film, would have stayed that way, another common-or-garden nun doing good works in a poverty-stricken shithole. Her star rose shortly after her (highly manipulative, I might add – Muggerodge tried to imply a bona-fide ‘miracle’ had occured during the filming, which was enough to draw mass interest and heaps of publicity) mass TV exposure and press coverage and she exploited it happily, with the backing of The Vatican, for the rest of her life, drawing in millions of pounds in donations, most of which, btw, is unaccounted for.

    History made Gandhi famous and known. Educators, historians and artists keep him known through education, popular historical treatises, movies, books and art – all ‘promotion’. There are many great historical figures whose contributions remain little or unknown due to lack of promotion, incidentally, not a few of them female.

    Feminism is a concept; a collection of often quite complex various socio-political philosophies. As such, of course it needs ‘promotion’, just like science needs promotion; everyone in the world has benefited from it to degrees they can barely comprehend yet there are still plenty who are actually anti-science or are still completely ignorant about what science actually is and what science has achieved, even in developed western countries. Especially in developed western countries, actually *indicates Bible Belt*.

    Comment by Alice Springz. — April 29, 2008 @ 6:12 am | Reply

  3. At the risk of losing my sisterhood of the traveling pants card, I admit that I too get frustrated by the many faces of feminism. The ideals they forward are beautiful indeed, but as so many beautiful ideals (democracy, religion, etc.) the real life execution doesn’t necessarily live up to the dream. This disappoints me and as you clearly outline, tends to put otherwise supportive hearted people off.

    I concur on the need for integrity and humility. Trust and honesty, too. I do find it slightly disingenuous to imagine that men are soley responsible for building our magnificent society. The more truthful idea is that women and men have acted as a team for some time in history now. The power structure has shifted and will continue to between the two, but even with the totally sterotypical sexist example of the June Cleaver approach, there are many things those manly society builders didn’t have to do because a woman did it. They didn’t do it alone. Recognition of each individual’s contributions is fair to note.

    I look forward to the day when what we contribute is the first thing we look at rather than gender. Until then, if I’m doing the same job as a man, I want the same pay. Child custody should default to shared custody, and women shouldn’t play both ends of the candle.

    I have a blog for female entrepreneurs and I am fascinated and often surprised that so many of them are caught in the quandry you describe. They haven’t figured it all out yet and I don’t think men have either. Fortunately, we all seem to be sincerely trying. Because of that, I think there is hope to move past the facade and build a worthwhile society together.

    Just my opinion…I agree on so many of your points that it’s hard to argue.:-)
    Vicki Flaugher

    Comment by Vicki Flaugher — May 8, 2008 @ 2:36 pm | Reply

  4. As you can see, Soltys, while post #3 represents a woman willing to engage in dialogue, the first two posts are indicative of the defensiveness and lack of insight so often found among feminist demagogues. Your point still stands, my good man.

    Comment by Anakin Niceguy — May 9, 2008 @ 9:26 pm | Reply

  5. [...] 2008 post, Anakin Niceguy of Biblical Manhood wrote about his dislike for Feminism. He references a post by Joe Soltys that criticizes the claim that Feminism is, in practice, about equality between men [...]

    Pingback by The tree of Feminism « Matthew5sixteen — August 4, 2010 @ 6:24 pm | Reply

  6. The feminism movement is certainly not alone in having its share of demagogues.

    I think the number of actual misandrist feminists is very, very small, and I don’t think there are very many feminists who ‘hate children’. But I’m sure there are some. Just as there are some religious adherents who misrepresent their faith by their shameful behaviour. I remember a case where an individual murdered a nurse or doctor who worked in an abortion clinic because it was, according to the accused, “wrong to take a life”. That case boggled the mind.

    It doesn’t seem quite right to blame feminism for the downfall of society, though (not that that’s what you’re doing here), any more than it’s right to blame a particular religion, a particular cultural group, or a particular shade of blue. Not *agreeing* with radical feminism is one thing, but if you *are* in the position of attempting to debate idealogical tenets, I don’t think it serves either side to be outwardly antagonistic (which, unfortunately, quite a few ‘radical’ people tend to be).

    Interesting thoughts, though.

    Comment by cenobyte — July 3, 2011 @ 10:06 am | Reply

  7. I totally agree with everything you’ve said here. I feel so sorry for all the guys in this world that have to live with those b*****s!!! I really hope that this dumb feminist movement ends soon. It seems right now everyone’s butt hurt. I hate all the political correctness in our society, really who gives a damn? It’s the same with both the feminists and the gays. They’re all rising up whining ‘Help me! I’ve been oppressed’. They’re all annoying little brats, that no one wants to listen to, crying to their mommies (the government) to do something about it. I think it’s time the government gave them a slap across the face or a well deserved time out. Just something to stop this idiocy from spiraling out of control. Instead of trying to be passive aggressive and not tip the apple cart by giving them what they want. If they do that they’re just going to keep asking for more and whine when they don’t get it, such is the way with spoiled children.

    Comment by Marisa — November 5, 2011 @ 7:55 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.